Skip to content

chore(codeowners): adapt the file for long-term support#2092

Closed
novusnota wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
closes-319/reviewers-wanted
Closed

chore(codeowners): adapt the file for long-term support#2092
novusnota wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
closes-319/reviewers-wanted

Conversation

@novusnota
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@novusnota novusnota commented Apr 16, 2026

Closes #319

  • yungwine, kuhel, inyellowbus, heyqbnk, ohld, kdimentionaltree — organize permissions

@mintlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

mintlify Bot commented Apr 16, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project Status Preview Updated (UTC)
mintlify-ton-docs 🟢 Ready View Preview Apr 16, 2026, 11:16 AM

💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 16, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7e065842-fe0b-4ca8-998c-cd7b772428eb

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch closes-319/reviewers-wanted

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@novusnota novusnota mentioned this pull request May 14, 2026
Merged
@novusnota
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

novusnota commented May 19, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Currently, it is tough to formulate CODEOWNERS well, and this file sends more noise than signal as of now. I don't want to ping folks left and right, especially without a valid reason to do so, which is review of technical accuracy, not the structural changes nor edits and merges of older PRs.

Let's return to the topic of CODEOWNERS file later on. And keep the branch.

@novusnota novusnota closed this May 19, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Adapt CODEOWNERS for long-term support

1 participant

@novusnota